OO3 is more and more like 'More' -- ??

[Timothy J.Wood]

   If you have MORE files that are being imported and losing 
information, please log a bug with <omnioutliner3 at omnigroup.com>, 
including an example file that demonstrates the problem.

-tim


On Monday, December 6, 2004, at 12:14  AM, Alfred Lang wrote:

> I agree in principle: OO3 is in many respects more and more like MORE. 
> But in many respects it is not (although much improved in others); 
> working with the old MORE could still be more complete if you are not 
> so much interested in columns - think of gathering clones, e.g. - if 
> only it were available in OS X. Except for some modernities in 
> handling and, of course, file formats and scripting. E.g. the print 
> command with possibility of changing margins on the fly is just great. 
> What I miss most in OO3, after some limited use yet: I thought that 
> one time it must become possible to transfer my old MORE files into a 
> modern outliner without loss.  OO 3 indeed reads MORE files except 
> under loss of most style and numbering features. I tried via more to 
> xml -- in vain: what I get is text mixed with formating command. Do I 
> perhaps miss some possibility in this. Can anybody give me good advice 
> in this? I think, now, with OO3, I would dare to proceed with this 
> outliner, but only so with a very good transfer of the work of so many 
> years.
>
> Best for all and special thanks to the Omni Group team, Alfred Lang
> -- 
>
> Alfred Lang, Psychology, Univ. Bern, Switzerland
> http://www.langpapers.net --- alfred.lang at psy.unibe.ch
> _______________________________________________
> OmniOutliner-Users mailing list
> OmniOutliner-Users at omnigroup.com
> http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/omnioutliner-users
>