OmniWeb timebomb (not a bug, a suggestion)
Louis A. Mamakos
louie at TransSys.COM
Sat Feb 4 14:25:28 PST 1995
>
> I would like to make a suggestion, however. When I logged in this
> morning and found that I couldn't use OmniWeb I immediately tried to ftp the
> new version. However, there are a lot of people probably doing the same thing,
> because I couldn't get on. Is it possible to let us know a day or two in
> advance? Then we wouldn't be falling all over each other to upgrade.
You might have also had a problem due to the broken DNS configuration:
louie at wa3ymh[439] $ dig ftp.omnigroup.com
; <<>> DiG 2.0 <<>> ftp.omnigroup.com
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY , status: NOERROR, id: 6
;; flags: qr rd ra ; Ques: 1, Ans: 3, Auth: 9, Addit: 9
;; QUESTIONS:
;; ftp.omnigroup.com, type = A, class = IN
;; ANSWERS:
ftp.omnigroup.com. 28577 CNAME ftp.titan.org.
ftp.titan.org. 28591 CNAME gaea.titan.org.
gaea.titan.org. 28591 A 198.151.161.97
It's not legal for a CNAME record to point to another name that is
itself a CNAME record. This apparently causes heartburn to the DNS
resolver/lookupd on my 3.3 system.
louie
More information about the OmniWeb-l
mailing list