OmniWeb 2.0, bundles, and Java
Garance A Drosehn
gad at eclipse.its.rpi.edu
Tue Oct 3 21:21:36 PDT 1995
William Shipley writes:
> > We haven't decided to do Java yet, nor have we decided not to
> > do it. We'd love to talk with anyone who's porting the language
> > to NEXTSTEP.
Andrew Abernathy <andrew at wire.omnigroup.com> replied:
> Of course, we're not entirely helpless without Java - we do have
> Postscript. For a couple of examples, check out my home page
> (see signature for URL). It does require that you not have Secure
> EPS turned on in the Expert settings under Preferences app.
Hrm. This is an interesting point, but not in the way you intended.
>From what little I know of Java, one advantage of it over something
like postscript is that Java isn't supposed to introduce security
holes. The above reminds me that web pages with EPS files could
be a great source of security issues unless one *does* turn on the
'Display EPS Securely' option.
I *think* that this suggests OmniWeb (and other NeXTSTEP browsers)
should display EPS securely, ignoring the setting of the option
in Preferences.app.
---
Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad at eclipse.its.rpi.edu
ITS Systems Programmer (handles NeXT-type mail)
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Troy NY USA
More information about the OmniWeb-l
mailing list