Problems with OmniWeb's free license.

Andrew Kwong akwong at fnbc.com
Thu Oct 19 12:41:27 PDT 1995


> From server at omnigroup.com Thu Oct 19 14:07:48 1995
> Date: Thu, 19 Oct 95 11:57:54 -0700
> Reply-To: omniweb-l at omnigroup.com
> Originator: omniweb-l at omnigroup.com
> Sender: omniweb-l at omnigroup.com
> From: Wolfgang Roeckelein <wolfgang at wi.WHU-Koblenz.de>
> To: Multiple recipients of list <omniweb-l at omnigroup.com>
> Subject: Re: Problems with OmniWeb's free license.
> X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0 -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
> X-Comment: OmniWeb Discussion
> Mime-Version: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 3.3 v118.2)
> Content-Type> : > text/plain> 
> Content-Length: 1001
> 
> Hi,
> 
> >> Well, but I would second this proposal. Those people who need more than one  
> >> OmniWeb running concurrently on their machine still had to pay !? ;-)
> >
> >I have to admit that I too would prefer a per-system limitation instead of a  
> >per-network one. I'm in a purely academic environment, and we're not granted  
> >much money for things like Web browsers. Besides, our use of the browsers is  
> >purely personal and academic, we are not doing business with it.
> >
> >Are there other people in this situation, or is it only me?
> >
> >I want to make clear this is only my opinion. I understand OmniGroup's
> >reasons for doing as they do, and I think OmniWeb is a great WWW browser. I'll  
> >definitely keep using it, at least in a shared-time fashion.
> 
> As I know, OmniWeb is included in the Lighthouse apps bundle, which is really  
> cheap (esp. when you realize what you get for your prize) for universities  
> and is definitly and highly recommended for any NeXTstep installation  
> anyway....
> 
>   Wolfgang
> 

I believe Lighthouse offers EDU discount......I remember that I bought my
Diagram2! (when I was in Graduate School) for .....$25....$50 something like
that.....

Andrew


More information about the OmniWeb-l mailing list