Jump to #<name tag> in page created by a cgi-bin script
Hussain Chinoy
hussain at artsci.wustl.edu
Mon Nov 27 15:57:49 PST 1995
Isn't this what Omni's aiming for? Some sort of bundle-ability
where you can pick and choose which bundle (netscape-extensions.bundle,
other-heretical.bundle, etc.) to add in to customise OW's HTML parsing
abilities?
Please correct me if I've understood incorrectly.
___ __________________________________________________________
/\__\ G. Hussain Chinoy
\/__/ 314/591-4955 vox
NEXTSTEP, 314/935-5799 fax
baby hussain at artsci.wustl.edu net
http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~hussain/ web
On Mon, 27 Nov 1995, Vadim S. Kaplunovsky wrote:
> I agree that to be useful OmniWeb must support all the non-standard features of
> the NetScape since to many people use that as a de-facto standard.
> However, it is not a good idea to abandon the official standard completely.
> Therefore, I would like to suggest a user-settable switch between
> "standard HTML" and "NetScape extensions allowed", the latter being the default
> setting but the former available when needed.
>
> ---
> *****************************************************************************
> Vadim S. Kaplunovsky, | vadim at bolvan.ph.utexas.edu (NextMail OK)
> Associate Professor of Physics, | #include <std_disclaimer.h>
> University of Texas at Austin. | #excuse bad_typing.
>
More information about the OmniWeb-l
mailing list