Jump to #<name tag> in page created by a cgi-bin script

Hussain Chinoy hussain at artsci.wustl.edu
Mon Nov 27 15:57:49 PST 1995


	Isn't this what Omni's aiming for?  Some sort of bundle-ability 
where you can pick and choose which bundle (netscape-extensions.bundle, 
other-heretical.bundle, etc.) to add in to customise OW's HTML parsing 
abilities?

	Please correct me if I've understood incorrectly.	

  ___	 __________________________________________________________
 /\__\        G. Hussain Chinoy
 \/__/                                 314/591-4955       vox
NEXTSTEP,                              314/935-5799       fax
  baby                     hussain at artsci.wustl.edu       net
              http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~hussain/       web

On Mon, 27 Nov 1995, Vadim S. Kaplunovsky wrote:

> I agree that to be useful OmniWeb must support all the non-standard features of  
> the NetScape since to many people use that as a de-facto standard.
> However, it is not a good idea to abandon the official standard completely.
> Therefore, I would like to suggest a user-settable switch between
> "standard HTML" and "NetScape extensions allowed", the latter being the default  
> setting but the former available when needed.
> 
> ---
> *****************************************************************************
> Vadim S. Kaplunovsky,              | vadim at bolvan.ph.utexas.edu (NextMail OK)
> Associate Professor of Physics,    | #include <std_disclaimer.h>
> University of Texas at Austin.     | #excuse bad_typing.
> 


More information about the OmniWeb-l mailing list