NetScape standards, 2.0 features, and purple pages
Wolfgang Roeckelein
wolfgang at wi.whu-koblenz.de
Tue Nov 28 03:00:25 PST 1995
Holger Hoffstaette wrote:
> Wolfgang wrote:
> > BTW has anybody heard something from NeXT regarding a API for NeXTTIME?
>
> NEXTIME is a public API in 4.0.
That's really good news.
>
> > This would make inline NeXTTIME possible. This leads to the question: Is
>
> Netsurfer already does inline video. :-) However, that still doesn't solve
But only MPEG, or have I missed something?
> the problem of getting the movie data as a second, isochronous data stream,
> independent from the control protocol, like it's been done with ISDN. Could
> have been a breeze with real SGML..
There are several proposols for this, realaudio (only audio) and xing (audio
and video) come to my mind (MBONE and CU-SEEME are also in this area). I think
this is not so much s SGML problem but more a problem for the transfer
protocol for isochronous data stream over unreliable data channels like the
TCP/IP Internet.
Wolfgang
More information about the OmniWeb-l
mailing list