OW 2.0 -- can it hack this site?

[Torrey McMahon]

Scott Fergusson wrote:
> htttp://www.word.com is probably one of the most technically pushed site
> out there. On netscape I get all kinds of animated icons, real-audio feeds,
> cool backgrounds.
>
> When I run it on OW2.0 beta 1 it first doesn't rec the browser as Netscape,
> but allows you to click if you do. However, the columns don't line up and
> the animated .gifs are gone..
>

Maybe because only Netscape can takes the Shockwave and Real-Audio plus  
in's, and the page has really bad HTML (notice the comment in the middle of  
the page). "Technically pushed"? Take a look at  
http://www.word.com/credits.html, try "Netscape Pushed". The last time I  
checked it was HTML not NSML.

And with all of that said my little comment on Netscape: Breaking new  
ground is one thing but having 85% of the market and destroying standards  
that they themselves say they support sounds like an other company I know  
that has a large market share in the OS department.


---
Torrey McMahon